fix(mcp): gate suggester on leading verb match

Production v0.18.1 logs showed read_message → "did you mean: send_message"
— two edits away by Levenshtein, but the opposite intent. An agent asking
to READ a single message getting nudged toward SEND is actively
misleading. Same trap was active for anything sharing a verb-less suffix
like _message, _channel, _task.

Constrain the Levenshtein candidates to those whose leading verb (token
before the first underscore) matches the input verb exactly. Substring
matching is unchanged. Drop the now-stale sned_message typo test case
(cross-verb typo correction is no longer in scope) and add a regression
test covering read_message, delete_message, fetch_channel.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

internal/mcp/bridge.go

@@ -250,8 +250,12 @@ var knownBridgeActions = []string{
 
 // suggestBridgeAction returns the closest known action name to `name`, or ""
 // if nothing is plausibly close. Strategy: cheap prefix/substring check first,
-// then Levenshtein within distance 3. Distance threshold scales with the
-// length of the input so very short strings don't false-match.
+// then Levenshtein within distance 3 — but Levenshtein matches must share the
+// leading verb (the token before the first underscore) with the candidate.
+// Without that constraint, e.g. `read_message` is two edits from `send_message`
+// and gets suggested, which is the opposite intent and actively misleading.
+// Distance threshold scales with the length of the input so very short strings
+// don't false-match.
 func suggestBridgeAction(name string) string {
 	if name == "" {
 		return ""
@@ -265,14 +269,19 @@ func suggestBridgeAction(name string) string {
 		}
 	}
 
-	// 2. Levenshtein on full names.
+	// 2. Levenshtein on full names, gated on a matching leading verb so
+	//    `read_message` is not "fixed" by suggesting `send_message`.
 	threshold := 3
 	if len(name) <= 6 {
 		threshold = 2
 	}
+	inputVerb := leadingVerb(lower)
 	bestDist := threshold + 1
 	best := ""
 	for _, candidate := range knownBridgeActions {
+		if leadingVerb(candidate) != inputVerb {
+			continue
+		}
 		d := levenshtein(lower, candidate)
 		if d < bestDist {
 			bestDist = d
@@ -285,6 +294,17 @@ func suggestBridgeAction(name string) string {
 	return ""
 }
 
+// leadingVerb returns the substring before the first underscore, or the
+// whole string if there is no underscore. Used to gate Levenshtein
+// suggestions so a shared suffix (like `_message`) doesn't pair `read_…`
+// with `send_…`.
+func leadingVerb(s string) string {
+	if i := strings.IndexByte(s, '_'); i >= 0 {
+		return s[:i]
+	}
+	return s
+}
+
 // levenshtein computes the Levenshtein edit distance between a and b using
 // a single rolling row of O(min(len)) space. Pure Go, no deps.
 func levenshtein(a, b string) int {

internal/mcp/bridge_test.go

@@ -612,10 +612,10 @@ func TestBridge_UnknownAction_Suggestion(t *testing.T) {
 	}{
 		// substring hit: "send" is contained in "send_message"
 		{input: "send", wantContains: "send_message"},
-		// Levenshtein: typo "sned_message" → "send_message" (distance 2)
-		{input: "sned_message", wantContains: "send_message"},
-		// Levenshtein: "list_channel" → "list_channels" (distance 1)
+		// Levenshtein within a shared verb: "list_channel" → "list_channels" (distance 1)
 		{input: "list_channel", wantContains: "list_channels"},
+		// Levenshtein within a shared verb: "get_channel_message" → "get_channel_messages"
+		{input: "get_channel_message", wantContains: "get_channel_messages"},
 	}
 
 	for _, tt := range tests {
@@ -650,6 +650,33 @@ func TestBridge_UnknownAction_NoSuggestion(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 }
 
+// TestBridge_UnknownAction_NoCrossVerbSuggestion guards against the suggester
+// pairing actions that share a suffix but have opposite intent — e.g.
+// `read_message` is two edits from `send_message`, but suggesting "send" to an
+// agent that asked to read is actively misleading. The leading-verb gate in
+// suggestBridgeAction must prevent this.
+func TestBridge_UnknownAction_NoCrossVerbSuggestion(t *testing.T) {
+	bridge, _, _, _ := newTestBridge(t)
+	ctx := context.Background()
+
+	cases := []string{
+		"read_message",        // would have suggested send_message (distance 2)
+		"delete_message",      // would have suggested send_message (distance 3)
+		"fetch_channel",       // unrelated verb; must not suggest send/list/get
+	}
+	for _, in := range cases {
+		t.Run(in, func(t *testing.T) {
+			_, err := bridge.Call(ctx, in, map[string]any{})
+			if err == nil {
+				t.Fatalf("expected error for %q", in)
+			}
+			if strings.Contains(err.Error(), "did you mean") {
+				t.Errorf("cross-verb suggestion leaked for %q: %v", in, err)
+			}
+		})
+	}
+}
+
 func TestLevenshtein(t *testing.T) {
 	tests := []struct {
 		a, b string