Algis DumbrisandClaude Opus 4.6
04e4e3ca37
Adds everything needed to run a real multi-Gemini-model reactive agent
loop end-to-end on SynapBus.
internal/harness/subprocess/config.go:
* AgentConfig.GeminiMD — content of workdir/GEMINI.md
* MaterialiseAgentConfig writes GEMINI.md AND workdir/.gemini/settings.json
when gemini_md is set. The settings file carries the same mcp_servers
list as .mcp.json (so a Gemini child running from the workdir gets
the exact MCP surface the operator configured, not the user's
~/.gemini/settings.json).
* 2 new config_test cases: GEMINI.md + .gemini/settings.json round
trip, GEMINI.md with empty mcp_servers still writes the settings
file (explicitly clearing any inherited home config).
internal/harness/registry.go — BUG FIX:
Resolve() now honours agent.HarnessName (explicit selection) BEFORE
the inference chain, matching the reactor's own agentBackendKind
policy. Previously, when multiple backends were registered,
Resolve would pick "webhook" for every non-K8s agent — even when the
agent's HarnessName was "subprocess" — because the original fallback
chain put webhook first. This is why the first cold-topic-explainer
run failed with "webhook: agent has no webhook config". Discovered
during e2e testing.
internal/admin/socket.go + cmd/synapbus/admin.go:
New `messages.send` admin command (socket + CLI). Sends a DM as any
agent through the messaging service, bypassing the REST/MCP auth
layers. Local-only via the admin Unix socket, so the threat model is
"whoever can reach the socket is already admin".
CLI:
synapbus messages send --from X --to Y --body "..." [--priority N]
synapbus messages send --from X --to Y --body-file path
echo "..." | synapbus messages send --from X --to Y
Used by the harness shell wrappers (so Gemini subprocess agents can
DM each other) and by run_task.sh (to kick off a chain as a human
user without implementing the REST session flow).
examples/cold-topic-explainer/ (NEW):
Runnable 3-agent Gemini demo that exercises the subprocess harness,
reactive triggers, recursive update, and all the preconditions (depth,
budget, cooldown) end-to-end on a separate isolated synapbus instance.
Layout:
README.md — usage + troubleshooting + cost notes
start.sh — builds synapbus, launches on port 18088 with
./data, creates user + agents + harness configs,
marks agents reactive via sqlite3
run_task.sh — sends initial DM algis → decomposer-pro, polls
reactive_runs + messages for the FINAL: reply,
prints the result or dumps reactive_runs on
timeout for debugging
stop.sh — SIGTERM + 5s grace + SIGKILL fallback
wrapper.sh — shared subprocess local_command: reads
message.json + GEMINI.md, calls gemini headless
with --approval-mode yolo, strips the
"MCP issues detected" noise prefix, routes the
cleaned response to the next agent via
`synapbus messages send` over the admin socket
configs/
decomposer-pro.json — gemini-3.1-pro-preview
(gemini-2.5-pro is currently capacity-
exhausted on Google's side)
writer-flash.json — gemini-2.5-flash
critic-lite.json — gemini-2.5-flash-lite
.gitignore — data/, bin/, synapbus.log, .synapbus.pid
The wrapper does NOT rely on gemini's MCP tool-calling (which was
unreliable in testing). Gemini is used as a pure text generator; the
shell decides routing based on AGENT_ROLE:
- decomposer → NEXT_AGENT (writer)
- writer → NEXT_AGENT (critic)
- critic → OWNER_AGENT if response starts with FINAL:,
REVISE_AGENT otherwise
E2E VERIFICATION (real run, real Gemini, not a mock):
Topic: "how does SynapBus unify message delivery, reactive agent
triggers, and harness runs on a single SQLite database?"
Result (from data/synapbus.db after one successful run):
harness_runs:
#1 decomposer-pro subprocess success 106s
#2 writer-flash subprocess success 155s
#3 critic-lite subprocess success 10s
reactive_runs: 3 rows, all succeeded, trigger_from chain:
algis → decomposer-pro → writer-flash → critic-lite
messages:
#1 algis → decomposer-pro (topic)
#2 decomposer-pro → writer-flash (Q1/Q2/Q3 breakdown)
#3 writer-flash → critic-lite (3-paragraph draft)
#4 critic-lite → algis (FINAL: + polished 3-paragraph explainer)
Critic converged in one pass (all scores ≥ 8), so the writer↔critic
refinement loop didn't need to recurse — but the plumbing for it
(REVISE: branch in wrapper.sh, depth limit in reactor) is wired and
ready. Flipping the critic's acceptance bar exercises the recursion.
Full `go test ./...` remained green through all changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
15 lines
1.1 KiB
JSON
15 lines
1.1 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"gemini_md": "# critic-lite\n\nYou are `critic-lite`, running on gemini-2.5-flash-lite.\n\nYou receive a 3-paragraph explainer from `@writer-flash`. Rate each paragraph on **clarity** (1-10) and **accuracy** (1-10). Decide the verdict:\n\n- **If every score is ≥ 8**, the draft is acceptable. Respond with:\n\n```\nFINAL: <the draft verbatim, no scores, no commentary>\n```\n\n- **Otherwise**, respond with:\n\n```\nREVISE:\n- Para 1: <what to fix, one line>\n- Para 2: <what to fix, one line>\n- Para 3: <what to fix, one line>\n\nCurrent draft (for context):\n<the draft verbatim>\n```\n\nBe strict but fair — the goal is a crisp 3-paragraph explainer that would pass a technical editor. Do not be verbose in your critique; one line per paragraph fix is enough. The first token of your reply MUST be `FINAL:` or `REVISE:` with no leading whitespace.",
|
|
"mcp_servers": [],
|
|
"env": {
|
|
"AGENT_NAME": "critic-lite",
|
|
"AGENT_ROLE": "critic",
|
|
"GEMINI_MODEL": "gemini-2.5-flash-lite",
|
|
"NEXT_AGENT": "writer-flash",
|
|
"REVISE_AGENT": "writer-flash",
|
|
"OWNER_AGENT": "algis",
|
|
"SYNAPBUS_SOCKET": "__SOCKET__",
|
|
"SYNAPBUS_BIN": "__BIN__"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|