Files
synapbus/examples
Algis DumbrisandClaude Opus 4.6 b5b5d6d26c fix(reactor): don't truncate body for subprocess + docker dispatch
dispatchHarness was capping event.Body at 4096 bytes before handing
it to the subprocess/docker harness. Those backends write the body
to a message.json file in the per-run workdir (bind-mounted into
the container) and have no shell/env-var size limits, so silent
truncation was hostile.

The doc-gardener inspector routinely produces 10-20 KiB findings
JSON (drift report with per-flag evidence). Truncation cut off the
trailing artifact.findings entries + artifact.recommendation,
making the report look incomplete to the critic — which then
spuriously REVISE'd, blowing the 600s deadline.

The K8s job path still truncates in createJob() because Kubernetes
imposes a 1 MiB env-var cap and most shells misbehave past a few
KiB. That's a separate code path, untouched.

Also: critic prompt rewrite (examples/doc-gardener/configs/critic.json).
The old critic spec told the critic to "spot-check evidence by
re-running the inspector's commands". That's structurally wrong:
the critic runs in a fresh container with no install state, so
re-running mcpproxy --help always fails and produces a false REVISE.
New prompt says: audit by structural consistency only, never run
shell commands to re-verify, default to FINAL, never REVISE more
than once, and FINAL the failure summary back to the owner when
the inspector reports status: failed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-15 13:31:36 +03:00
..

SynapBus examples

Runnable demos of SynapBus features. Each example is self-contained under its own directory, launches an isolated synapbus instance on a distinct port, and cleans up after itself.

Example Feature Real LLM? Port
cold-topic-explainer/ Reactive agent triggers + subprocess harness — three Gemini agents (decomposer → writer → critic) collaborate via DMs to produce a 3-paragraph explainer, with real LLM calls end-to-end. ✅ yes (gemini CLI) 18088
doc-gardener/ Dynamic agent spawning (spec 018) — a coordinator meta-agent decomposes a goal into a task tree, spawns specialists with config_hash-rooted trust + delegation-cap enforcement, runs them through the state machine, generates a rich HTML report. ❌ v1 is synthetic (primitives demo); real LLM coordinator is a follow-up PR 18089

Quick start

Pick an example, cd into it, and follow its README. In general:

cd examples/<name>
./start.sh        # rebuild + launch an isolated synapbus instance
./run_task.sh     # drive the demo flow
./report.sh       # (where applicable) render an HTML report
./stop.sh         # shut down

Both examples use the same layout for consistency:

examples/<name>/
├── start.sh             # build & launch
├── run_task.sh          # execute the demo flow
├── stop.sh              # shut down
├── report.sh            # (doc-gardener only) render HTML report
├── bin/
│   ├── synapbus         # built from the current checkout
│   └── <helper>         # example-specific driver binary
├── configs/             # per-agent JSON configs (harness_config, prompts, etc.)
├── data/                # isolated SQLite DB + attachment store + sockets
├── synapbus.log         # server stdout+stderr
└── README.md            # example-specific docs

What each example proves

  • cold-topic-explainer proves that the SynapBus reactor + subprocess harness can drive a real multi-agent loop with three distinct LLMs, with depth and budget guards, OpenTelemetry tracing, and harness_runs accounting.
  • doc-gardener proves that the dynamic-agent-spawning data primitives — goals, goal_tasks with denormalized ancestry, atomic optimistic-lock claim, config_hash-keyed reputation ledger, delegation-cap enforcement, per-billing-code cost rollup — work end-to-end against real SQLite, and feed a rich HTML report.

The two examples are complementary: cold-topic-explainer exercises the runtime path (reactor → harness → LLM → DMs), doc-gardener exercises the work-tracking path (goals → tasks → trust → report). A future example will combine them into a full LLM-driven coordinator loop.

Global prereqs

  • Go 1.25+
  • sqlite3, curl, jq on $PATH
  • A free TCP port per example (see table above)
  • For cold-topic-explainer only: gemini CLI authenticated via gemini auth login

Troubleshooting

  • Port already in use: set SYNAPBUS_PORT=18090 ./start.sh (each example honors the env var).
  • Web UI is blank: rebuild the embedded Svelte SPA with make web from the repo root once, then re-run ./start.sh.
  • Stale binary: delete the example's bin/ directory and rerun ./start.sh to force a rebuild.